One is more of a summary than anything else, and it is by Patrick Madigan in Heythrop Journal.
The second is by Vlad Todor at Concrete Academic, and offers a thoughtful evaluation not only of the book's argument, but also of how well I did (or didn't) write in a way that makes the book both accessible to a general readership and interesting for scholars.
I notice that so far there is only one customer review on Amazon.com, so if you've written a review of the book on your blog, please do consider posting it on Amazon as well. Thanks!






1 comments:
Enticing!
Todor thinks you should have given more background; but when I find something I don't understand it just spurs me on to do more reading.
Post a Comment