Monday, June 8, 2009

The Anti-Creed

There was a humorous moment in Sunday school this week when, in a discussion of the Baptist principle of "soul freedom", someone read from the American Baptist identity statement. In this statement which, when printed out runs about 3 pages, and is clearly longer than the Nicene Creed, we encountered the phrase "We accept no humanly devised confession or creed as binding." And that seemed to cover the "creed" that was being read from - a creed that negates the authority of creeds!

Of course, the irony is only apparent. The American Baptist statement is an attempt to give expression to points of faith, doctrine and practice that most American Baptists share. But it isn't a creed in the sense of an authoritative document that is imposed hierarchically from the top down.

Nevertheless, the apparent tension was striking. It is perhaps matched only by the experience of reading one of Paul's letters in English and getting to the point where he says that the letter kills...

2 comments:

Chris said...

Hi James,

The Baptists may not consider their Faith and Message binding on the average laymember, but they certainly do apply it in a binding way to missionaries and university faculty. By using it to filter their leadership, they create a trickle-down effect that generally results in a membership committed to it, as well. Ultimately the effects are the same: it is a document that defines the community and its theological boundaries, and is used to exclude those who fall outside the pale. I think it is more than an "apparent" irony that the Baptists are one of the most letter-centric denominations in the United States today.

-Chris

Rhology said...

I'd say there's a nuanced approach to be taken here, as far as creeds/confessions go.
Here is the fuller statement:

-Although Baptists have produced numerous confessions to express our common understandings of Christian faith, we hold the Scriptures, the Old and New Testaments, as our final authority. We accept no humanly devised confession or creed as binding.-

ISTM (though I'm not a member of an American Baptist church; I'm just sayin') that it's one thing to have a confession/creed by which we distill our beliefs about what the Bible, as final authority, says, and use that as a filter/shibboleth for church membership. It's quite another to say the creed/confession is the final authority. Yet of course the church that holds to the creed/confession believes that it faithfully repeats the doctrine taught in the Bible.
It's more practical than saying "We believe the Bible", since people twist and turn that kind of thing all over the place.

My two pence. Most of my life I've gone to non-creedal/confessional churches, and the one I attend now has a sorta-confession, but I'm more and more of the opinion that confessional = better.

And Chris, the NT very clearly and obviously teaches the necessity and propriety of church membership, distinction of member and non-member, and discipline/excommunication of those who dissent, teach heresy, engage in unrepentant immorality, etc. Exclusion is part and parcel of any worldview. Or perhaps you'd like a bunch of neo-Nazi skinheads, Black Panthers, jihadist suicide bombers, Zionists, and Hindu militants in your Sunday School class, each trying to teach his own ideas.

Peace,
Rhology